You can feel the same way, if you have ever attempted to procure parts to a complex electronics assembly, something containing dozens of parts, custom interconnects, and long lead times. You have a spreadsheet open in one tab, three distributor websites open in others, and your inbox gradually is being clogged with quotes received at various times, in various forms.
It's exhausting. And this mayhem is no exception to the case of engineers and procurement staff on multi-part projects. It's often just Tuesday. The query to consider is whether the current SaaS tools have finally reached the issue. Will software really help de-source the sourcing process or will it merely provide another tab to control?
Being quite frank is what makes this difficult. It is not only volume, but it is interdependence.
A resistor substitution could cause you to move to another footprint.
Such a change of footprint influences your board layout.
Your enclosure is influenced by board layout.
And somewhere in that chain, a Custom wiring harness needs to be re-specced because the connector positions have shifted.
Single part sourcing is actually at best unnecessary administrative overhead. Multi-part sourcing, especially on production runs, is where a small misstep becomes a cost explosion and time overrun. Usually addressing all this needs a deep supplier relationship, spreadsheet wizardry, plus a lot of emails and follow-ups that nobody wants to do.
The newer generation of SaaS tools is not doing what the old ERP systems were doing. Many of them are designed based on the real buying process engineers experience rather than trying to force you to change the way you work with the software.
BOM management is a good place to start. There are a number of platforms which now allow you to import a Bill of Materials directly and immediately cross-reference it with live inventory with various distributors.
Single View: Availability, pricing levels and lead times are available in a single view, not after three hours of tab-switching.
Intelligence: The more intelligent tools go further. They mark substitutes where a component is backordered, display price deviations, and even maintain a revision history so that you can view the historical change of your BOM.
The collaboration features are also important in the case of teams that operate with manufacturers abroad or in different time zones. The ability to share a sourcing project, comment on individual line items, and monitor the degree of approval without initiating another email chain is actually helpful. These are not cosmetic features, they decrease the miscommunication of the kind that leads to re-orders and delays.
Off-the-shelf passives and ICs off the shelf are simple. The sourcing process becomes more complex when you start using custom or semi-custom parts—and this is where the SaaS tools are yet to catch on.
Consider the process of vetting and coordinating with a PCB Assembly Manufacturer. Previously, this could frequently imply the transmission of files, the wait of DFM response, the bargaining of NRE prices and thus the manual tracking of revision periods—no matter what sourcing tool you were utilizing. There are even platforms that are starting to add manufacturer portals in-store, so you can now push design files, quote, and feedback in the same environment. It is not quite an all-encompassing smooth sail, but the wind is blowing in the right direction.
This is the same case with other custom components. A Custom Cable Assembly, for example, isn't something you grab off a distributor shelf. It involves:
Drawings and specifications sheets.
Sample approvals.
Regulatory documentation.
These types of parts, vendor scorecards, document management, and milestone tracking that makes the entire process transparent rather than hidden in the inbox of someone are the exact types of workflow support that is being developed by the better SaaS sourcing platforms.
An isolated sourcing tool is a half-story. The actual value would be when it links up to the other parts of your stack, your ERP, your PLM system, your accounting software. The vast majority of mature SaaS sourcing systems have API access or direct integrations, and this has allowed your purchase orders, inventory values and supplier data to maintain a live connection without the manual export and import gymnastics.
Even lighter integrations would count even in smaller teams that do not have a full ERP. Integrating with Google Sheets, Slack alerts on quote progress, or an Airtable-based project tracker can save you a lot of time in the number of sites you have to visit to know the progress of a project.
SaaS solutions cannot solve a sourcing process that is inherently in a mess. When you have erratic BOMs, a poor supplier relationship or a bad internal approval process, software will not suppress those issues but will only serve as a mirror to these issues. It is a feature, not a bug—but it also implies that the transition period will be bumpy.
And there is the problem of fit. A site that requires high volume consumer electronics purchasing can be more than a company with a ten-person hardware startup can afford or manage to operate. It is worth considering software, not only by what it can do, but also by its size and complexity to your project.
Yes—genuinely. Not flawlessly, and not without an initial expenditure of setting up and process alignment. However, in the case of teams that have to cope with multi-part sourcing on a daily basis, the appropriate SaaS also could enable them to reduce a multi-day process into hours.
The visibility increases, the number of errors reduces, and the cognitive load of the process of monitoring a dozen moving parts at the same time becomes significantly less. The tools are not equally good and the market is still in infancy. However, when using too many spreadsheets, too many emails, too many times you find yourself asking yourself about which version of the BOM is really up to date, it is probably high time to take a serious look at what is out there. Investment is normally worth it.
It will never be totally frictionless when it comes to hardware sourcing. At least, though, with the proper program it will be controllable.